Skip to: Content


Services

Archive for January, 2010

How Burnham Energy Came to BE

Thursday, January 21st, 2010

Burnham Energy is a wholly owned subsidiary of Burnham Nationwide, Inc., but it didn’t start out that way.  Here’s how BE came to be.

In 2007, Greg Sellers was working as an independent consultant advising private and public sector clients.  He had a strong interest in renewable energy and was encouraged by several friends to get involved in Silicon Valley’s emerging solar energy industry.

A group of Seller’s colleagues and friends in the solar industry were interested in addressing the industry-wide challenges that were constricting the development of solar energy, and they partnered to found SolarTech, an organization modeled after Semitech, the industry consortium that spurred the development of the semiconductor industry.

SolarTech identified six areas within the solar energy industry that needed to be addressed and subsequently created committees for each subset.  Because of his strong background in public/private sector collaboration, Sellers served and ultimately chaired the SolarTech Permitting Committee.

It quickly became obvious to Sellers that there were two permitting challenges: the time and challenges associated with the issuance of a building permit, and the time and challenges associated with the building inspection process.  As Sellers worked on solutions to these challenges, he realized that some of these solutions might best be met in the private sector.  In July 2007, Sellers founded StablSolar and sought to develop a better way of processing permits and providing inspections.

The first solution was to provide building inspection services for rapidly growing solar companies that couldn’t spare a senior staff person to wait for a building inspector to sign off on a project.  While Sellers was familiar with the public sector approval process, he felt that he needed a partner who was more familiar with private section inspections, and thus teamed with Saul Inda to round out StablSolar.

Because the solar industry was new, finding training was a challenge.  They signed up for every solar installation or inspection oriented class they could find.  When they thought they were ready, they approached a respected solar power installer and asked if they could start providing building inspection services.  They negotiated an agreement, learned about their process, and in December 2008 began providing their first inspection services.

That same month, Sellers spoke with the head of the California Solar Energy Industries Association and learned that Grid Alternatives , an Oakland-based non-profit, had just been awarded a statewide contract to install solar projects on affordable homes throughout California, but needed to hire a company to independently verify that the projects had met state requirements.  Sellers contacted them and soon negotiated an agreement to provide compliance inspections throughout the Pacific Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison territories, roughly 80 percent of the state.

With signed contracts in hand, Sellers realized that there was a great need for inspection services.  He also realized that he needed additional capital in order to grow.  But after months of seeking capital in the middle of the worst recession in 80 years, his prospects were not bright.

In May 2009, Sellers participated in the first annual SolarTech Summit where leaders from the industry gather to exhibit the latest developments and technology.  The event attracted the attention of Dan Phelps, a partner at a major Silicon Valley venture capital firm.  Phelps had recently joined the board of Burnham Nationwide , and was advising Burnham to consider the solar industry as an opportunity for future growth.  In Greg and Dan’s discussions, it seemed as though there was an opportunity to partner and grow with the expanding market.  After having met with Dan, Greg traveled to Chicago and met with Carson Kyhl, Burnham Nationwide’s CEO.  They agreed that a partnership was worth pursuing and together formed Burnham Energy.

Burnham Energy reached its first milestone by participating in the annual Solar Power International Conference in Anaheim.  The conference attracted nearly 1,000 exhibitors and over 25,000 participants.  Following the conference, Burnham Energy had a clear sense of its client base, and had honed its message.

As part of the Burnham Nationwide family, Burnham Energy has access to a robust IT infrastructure, a national network of municipal and professional contacts, and the resources to identify opportunities and grow with the solar industry.  As we develop in 2010, Burnham Energy is poised to become the leading permitting and inspection services provider in the solar industry.

Related Posts:

ANSI In Your Pantry

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

By Leah Riley
Senior Code Consultant with The Code Group/Burnham Nationwide

You would not think that designing a simple kitchenette/pantry in an office space would be a challenge, but in those municipalities that reference ANSI A 117.1, 2003, these requirements can be daunting. IBC 1109.4 notes that where kitchens and kitchenettes are provided in accessible spaces or rooms, they shall be accessible in accordance with ICC A117.1.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) currently requires a kitchenette to be accessible only when serving the public or in specific uses. However, in cities such as Chicago, as well as, those enforcing the International Building Code (IBC) 2006 which references ICC ANSI 2003, a kitchenette/pantry is required to be accessible regardless of where it is located and who is using it, even if in an office or retail employee space. The proposed ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) also includes these requirements, but it will not be enforceable until passed.

ANSI Section 804 specifies requirements such as the minimum clearance between counters; heights of work surfaces and sinks as well as appliance and storage reach ranges. The following is a summary of these requirements:

Minimum Clearances: Depending on the layout of the kitchenette, it shall be designed to provide the minimum clearances between counters, cabinets and appliances. Pass thru kitchens where counters, appliances or cabinets are on two opposing sides shall provide a minimum clear width of 40 inches and there shall be two entries. U-Shaped kitchens that are enclosed on three sides shall provide clearances of 60 inches between all opposing cabinets, counter tops, appliances or walls.

Work Surfaces: All work surfaces shall provide for a clear floor space that allows a forward approach and a height between 28 inches minimum and 34 inches above the floor. However, an exception notes that in kitchens that do not provide a cook-top or conventional range, an accessible work surface is not required.

Sink: All sinks shall meet compliance with Section 606 with the sink set no greater than 34 inches above the floor with a bowl depth no greater than 6-1/2 inches. The hardware must be lever or equal and the piping under the sink must be insulated or enclosed. All operable parts including towel and soap dispensers and dryers must be within reach range. Clear floor space, positioned for a forward, approach shall be provided. However, an exception allows for a parallel approach at a kitchen sink where a cook top or conventional range is not provided.

Storage: It is important to note that at least 50 percent of shelf space in cabinets shall be accessible. All accessible storage shall be within reach range of 15 inches and 48 inches per Section 305. The height is measured to the top of the shelf surface. A 30-inch by 48-inch clear floor space shall be provided in front of the accessible storage area.

Appliances: Any appliance within the kitchenette/pantry shall be accessible providing a clear floor space and having elements (storage areas or controls and operating mechanisms within reach range).  For the refrigerator/freezer, a portion of each element shall be accessible. The best means to achieve this is to provide a side by side or model with the freezer on the bottom. The other option is to go with a smaller unit where the bottom of the freezer shelf is no greater than 48 inches above the floor. If a microwave or range/oven is provided, it shall be located where all the controls and operating mechanisms are within reach range. If there is a vending machine, an accessible model shall be provided.

While taking a quick look at these requirements, they do not seem too unreasonable until you have to figure out how to place 50% of the shelving within reach range. Adding a shelf to the base cabinet is the most logical location for meeting compliance. However, the area under the counter is often occupied with sink piping and a water heater. A dishwasher and trash and recycling bins or other elements are often also located here. This leaves very limited storage areas below. Therefore, the bulk of the pantry storage is provided above the sink. Note that the counter itself can’t be included towards meeting these requirements unless there are shelves sitting on it. Also, if storage is provided under the sink, even though a forward approach may not be needed, the piping should be protected.

In order to provide sufficient counter space for a microwave, coffee pot and other appliances, the upper shelving is typically set at above 50 inches and not within reach range. To determine the amount of accessible shelving required, the percentage of shelving available between 15 and 48 inches above the floor mush be calculated. As the depth of the lower cabinets is usually deeper than the upper cabinets, this extra area could also be included within the calculation. Therefore, the best method would be to measure the shelves based on square feet.

Sometimes adaptations, such as providing two shelves between 15 inches and the counter top within cabinets, as well as reducing the number of shelves in the upper cabinets may be needed in order to meet compliance. While this does not seem logical from a usage perspective, the current accessibility code drives this design.

We are not aware of how this is being enforced in other areas, but in Chicago, this is the accessibility correction comment often noted when a pantry is provided. It is also one of the top issues raised when Business or Retail use projects participating in the Self-Certification process are audited. Architects who were issued this correction or were audited indicate that this was the first time they have heard of requirements for accessible storage at the pantry, even though the code has been in effect for some time.

For this reason, it is recommended to check your local code requirements to determine whether or not IBC 2006 and/or ANSI A117.1, 3002 are the referenced standards. If so, your plans should clearly provide details confirming that Kitchenette/Pantry meets full compliance.

About the Author:
Leah Riley is a Senior Code Consultant with The Code Group/Burnham Nationwide, with over sixteen years of experience in interpreting and providing consulting services for a number of local, national and international building and accessibility codes.  Ms. Riley has gained recognition throughout the construction industry as one of the foremost experts in ADA interpretation through her years of service for the City of Chicago Mayor’s Office for Peoples with Disabilities.

Related Posts:

Michael S. Skomsky Joins Burnham New York

Friday, January 1st, 2010

Burnham New York is pleased to announce the addition of Michael Skomsky to our team as Business Development Manager. Michael joins us with a wealth of knowledge and over 10 years of experience garnered while employed at BOMA/NY, primarily as its Deputy Executive Director / Director of Legislation. Michael’s passion regarding the New York real estate industry, and his sincere commitment to help make it better, will be enhanced by his new responsibilities at Burnham New York.

"I view my primary responsibility as connecting Burnham professionals with real estate building owners and managers. It is my hope and expectation that I will successfully serve as a bridge in making these connections possible and ultimately rewarding for everyone involved." ~Michael S. Skomsky

Related Posts:

  • No Related Posts
"Burnham is a first-rate operation. I rely on them to coordinate many of the permit-related tasks that I am too busy to do myself. I draw on their knowledge on changing municipal requirements, proactive problem solving and would definitely recommend them to others."
Rich Neubauer,
McDonald's
"I've had great success with Burnham for permit expediting, and recently learned they offer code consulting. They are great in meetings and provide excellent reports supported by detailed research and experience. I will use them whenever I have code issues on a project."
Jeff Kennedy,
Centaur Construction
"I like Burnham because their response time is terrific. They're professional with a systematic approach and solid corporate infrastructure - and their web-based system shows me exactly what is happening with my permits at all times."
Tom McCloskey,
The Related Companies, L.P.
"Working with Burnham makes the best use of my resources. It would be too costly for me to have staff who know as much as they do about the permit process."
Mike Moravek,
The John Buck Company
"Burnham is always a vital part of our Project Team. Their level of service and professionalism far surpasses their competition. The first call I make when a new project comes in is to Burnham."
Gregg Navins,
OMARA Organization, Inc
"We have tried other permit services in the past but only Burnham delivers the level of detail, follow through and accountability necessary to be successful in today's complex permit acquisition arena."
Dave Morgan,
The Body Shop
"Speed and efficiency are paramount, we aren't looking for just another layer of project management. Burnham gets the process due to their strong knowledge of jurisdictional requirements, and excellent working relationships with municipal staffs."
Glenn D. Middleton,
Design Forum
"We have come to rely heavily on Burnham's expertise... they have developed a professional consulting practice that we are proud to be associated with."
Michael T Clune,
Clune Construction Company